rjakimowich1
rjakimowich1 rjakimowich1
  • 02-03-2022
  • History
contestada

do you think countries should intervene with others if it does not directly affect them? when would it be acceptable?

Respuesta :

aaronsflyingfox
aaronsflyingfox aaronsflyingfox
  • 02-03-2022

Answer:

I don't think countries should intervene with others when it doesn't directly affect them. One reason is that it's not that certain country's problem so stay out before you drag yourself in. Right? Two unless allied with a country that is having a problem then just stay out of it completely. You wouldn't like to create a problem of your own either.

Explanation:

Hope this is what you were looking for

A brainliest is always appreciated.

Good luck

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Napoleon sold the Louisiana Territory to the United States because he A. felt that the United States would be the best country to manage the land. B. was forced
The Etruscans made sculptures in all of the following materials except _____. bronze stone terra cotta marble
What multiples of 4 are not factors of 48?
See that girl over there standing by the door? It might have been ____ who left the book on the table. she her
what is the correct plural form of elf
Which number is irrational? A) 3/17 B) √25 C) 0.6 (the six has a line on top of it) D) √33
Most aquatic animals conduct _____ fertilization.
what does brink of extinction mean
Why did Marcus Garvey call for Black people to build their own businesses
If all vegetation in the pond died what effect would it have on the animals? and why